Tech and Gizmo dot Com

With just days to go before Apple is likely to unveil a long-expected tablet device, rumors continue to circulate over its details. As the buzz continues, we wanted to wrap up what we have heard recently.

You want 3G with that? Sources inside both AT&T and Verizon once again say that an Apple tablet will be compatible with not just one or the other, but both networks. The source from Verizon claims that it will work automatically with Verizon’s WiFi hotspots and switch seamlessly to EVDO when out of range. Whether such a service would work the same on AT&T isn’t known, but that company did boast to Fox that it has “the largest network of Wi-Fi hotspots in the country.”

Further rumors peg Qualcomm as the supplier of the 3G chip for the tablet. Apple may build separate versions, one with HSPA+ chips for AT&T and most other carriers, and another with EVDO chips for Verizon and other carriers using the CDMA standard. Alternately, Apple may even include a chip recently designed by Qualcomm that’s capable of connecting to either network.

Buy one dock connector, get one free. Sources for iLounge say that the tablet will have not one, but two dock connectors—one on the horizontal bottom, and one on a vertical “bottom.” This would allow the device to be docked in either landscape or portrait orientation while charging. This way, the tablet could perform different functions—playing video or reading books, for example—while set in a single charging station.

The tablet will also have generously sized antennas, if the “long rear stripe” of plastic along the back—which breaks up the device’s metal casing—is any indicator. That should offer better reception that the small antennas on the iPhone, and may enable 802.11n compatibility.

As per the latest report by Flurry, a software company that makes application tracking software, Google has just managed to sell 20000 Nexus One phones, a far cry from the sales registered by other smartphones in the market.

The Motorola Droid, launched November last year had sold 250,000 units and T-Mobile My Touch, released in August, recorded 60,000 units sold in the first week.

Further, iPhone 3GS launched in June in eight countries had registered staggering 1.6 million as sales.

have not seen or heard any projections for how many Nexus One handsets Google planned on selling, but I imagine that it expected higher than the reported 20,000. Apple set the bar pretty high, selling 1.6 million iPhone’s in the week following its launch, but the Droid sold more than 12 times the Nexus One, and even the MyTouch 3G pushed out 60,000 in the first week.

Granted, while Verizon invested millions marketing the Droid and generating buzz prior to its launch, Google actually did the exact opposite–trying to work in stealth and keep the existence of the Nexus One and specific details of the device secret. Still, I think Google would be lying if it didn’t admit that 20,000 is a disappointing start.

Network Issues

As soon as users began to receive their Nexus One handsets, complaints of flaky or non-existent 3G connectivity began to mount. There is room for finger-pointing, and it can be debated whether those issues are a function of the handset–which is made by HTC, or the network–which is managed by T-Mobile.

The bottom line, though, is that it is Google’s phone. Google chose to develop a branded Android smartphone, and regardless of whether issues lie with the hardware or the network, the buck ultimately stops at Google.

Marketing aside, part of the reason that the Droid is more successful is the choice of provider. Motorola partnered with Verizon–the largest wireless provider in the United States, while Google chose to hitch its wagon to T-Mobile.

If you want to revolutionize smartphones–or even rebrand them as “superphones”–the obvious choice is to go with the last place wireless provider. Verizon has the largest 3G network. AT&T claims the fastest 3G network. Sprint markets its 3G network as the most dependable. What is T-Mobile’s network claim to fame? Smallest?

Google’s decision to launch its revolution by partnering with T-Mobile shows shockingly poor judgment. Perhaps T-Mobile is easier to push around and more willing to give Google the types of concessions it was seeking?